ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2026
Clinical and prognostic insights into radiation-associated angiosarcoma: a multi-institutional analysis.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate oncological outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) treated at referral centers.
methodsWe conducted a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of patients with histopathologically confirmed primary or recurrent RAAS treated at four referral centers in Germany. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were assessed using multivariable Cox regression.
resultsAmong 71 patients (97.2% female; median age 69 years), 90% had a history of breast cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT). RAAS developed after a mean latency of 7 years, with a median RT dose of 59.4 Gy. Over a median follow-up of 13.0 months, OS reached a median of 41.7 months, with 1- and 2-year rates of 82.9% and 61.7%, respectively. Median PFS was 9.5 months, with 1- and 2-year rates of 43.7% and 27.1%. Larger tumor size (HR 1.09, p = 0.032) and metastatic disease at diagnosis (HR 2.98, p = 0.003) were associated with worse OS.
conclusionsRAAS are aggressive, frequently relapsing malignancies occurring years after RT. Larger tumor size and metastatic presentation are associated with worse OS. Multi-institutional and translational studies are needed to clarify disease biology, refine risk factors, and guide treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.