ArticleBMC medical education2026
Empowering medical educators to teach planetary health: development and outcomes of a curriculum integration training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlanetary Health (PH) content is increasingly recognized as essential for medical education. For longitudinal integration across the curriculum, medical educators can serve as change agents and multipliers. A targeted training that conveys both PH knowledge and pedagogical skills can empower medical educators to incorporate PH topics into their teaching.
methodsFollowing the curriculum development cycle by Kern, we developed a training for medical educators of Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin teaching in the medical curriculum. The learning objective was to enable medical educators to effectively integrate PH content into their courses. The program was delivered in a blended-learning format: input on the interconnectedness between human and planetary health was provided online via a learning platform prior to the in-person unit (1 teaching unit [TU]). The face-to-face workshop (6 TU) gave input on Planetary Health as well as didactic input and facilitated discussion of personal experiences with climate change and its relevance to teaching, thereby enhancing participants' change agency. Further, participants developed teaching materials for their own courses and tested them via a micro-teaching exercise. As follow-up the participants revised their teaching materials-based feedback on their micro teaching (1 TU). The impact of the workshop was evaluated according to Kirkpatrick's framework.
resultsEighteen medical educators participated across three workshops, with 13 completing the follow-up questionnaire. Seventeen participants (94% response rate) completed the post-workshop evaluation. Participants reported satisfaction with the content, structure, and practical relevance of the course and rated their knowledge gain as moderate to high. Fifteen participants intended to integrate the developed teaching materials into their courses, and 14 planned to share their materials with colleagues. One year later, nine participants (50%) responded to a follow-up survey; five had integrated the materials into their teaching, and three had shared them with colleagues.
conclusionA targeted training that actively prepares and supports the transfer of knowledge into teaching practice is well received by medical educators. PH content was integrated into courses by a subset of participants. Beyond the workshop, ongoing networking may further support sustainable PH content integration into the curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.