Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618922›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

"We built the ship as we sailed it": exploring public health outreach targeting communities shaped by migration in Stockholm, Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mattias Strand, Baidar Al-Ammari, Önver Cetrez, Soorej Jose Puthoopparambil, Sofie Bäärnhielm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mattias StrandCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. mattias.strand@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4799-0737
Baidar Al-AmmariCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Önver CetrezDepartment of Theology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Soorej Jose PuthoopparambilGlobal Health and Migration Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sofie BäärnhielmCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective health crisis communication requires culturally sensitive, community-engaged approaches, particularly for reaching vulnerable populations. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant gaps in public health preparedness for communities shaped by migration. This study explores how public health staff in Stockholm, Sweden designed and delivered crisis communication targeting migrant populations during the pandemic.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted using eight individual in-depth interviews and three focus group discussions with 21 participants involved in planning, producing, and disseminating COVID-19 public health messages in Stockholm. Participants included public health strategists, communications officers, and frontline healthcare staff. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsFour main themes emerged from the data, revealing a temporal evolution in outreach strategies. Initially, efforts focused heavily on language translation of standardized health messages. However, participants recognized this approach as insufficient and gradually shifted toward more dialogue-based engagement. Key developments included: (a) establishing trust through active involvement of community stakeholders such as religious leaders, neighborhood organizers, and social media influencers; (b) addressing structural barriers including overcrowded housing, precarious employment, and digital exclusion rather than assuming non-adherence reflected poor understanding; (c) counteracting stigma related to infection and vaccination; and (d) fostering creative problem-solving despite organizational rigidity and unclear coordination. Participants emphasized the importance of listening to the concerns in the community and co-developing solutions rather than simply disseminating information. However, many expressed concern that networks established during the pandemic and insights gained about structural inequalities were already being lost as systems "returned to normal".

conclusionPublic health authorities must move beyond one-way messaging toward sustained community partnership and dialogue-based engagement. Effective crisis preparedness requires addressing social determinants of health and building community networks during non-crisis periods, rather than relying on ad-hoc solutions during emergencies. Without institutional commitment to translating crisis experiences into lasting structural changes, authorities risk repeating past mistakes and eroding public trust-a critical concern given the likelihood of future health crises.

trial registrationThe study protocol was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/rt47j) on March 22, 2022.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthTransients and MigrantsFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2SwedenCommunity involvementCOVID-19Health communicationMigrant healthMigrationPublic healthSuperdiversity

Identifiers

PMID42618922
PMCPMC13488172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.