ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2026
Integration of artificial intelligence in public health dentistry: applications, challenges, and future directions - a scoping review.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare delivery globally, with increasing applications in public health dentistry. This scoping review maps and synthesises the current state of AI integration in public health dentistry practice, education, research, and surveillance. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (with Google Scholar used as a supplementary source) from database inception to December 31, 2024. Thirteen studies were included to map the range of evidence on AI applications, performance metrics, and implementation challenges using PRISMA-ScR guidelines and a structured narrative synthesis. Consistent with scoping review methodology, this study aimed to map existing evidence and identify research gaps rather than evaluate or establish the effectiveness of AI interventions. In preliminary studies conducted under varied and predominantly controlled or pilot conditions, AI applications were reported across multiple public health dentistry domains: (1) disease surveillance, with reported machine learning accuracy of 82-94% for caries prediction in individual studies; (2) community screening, with reported sensitivity of 85-92%; (3) health education, with reported 18-23% improvements in knowledge scores; (4) tele-dentistry, with reported diagnostic concordance of 81-87%; and (5) policy planning, with reported utilisation prediction accuracy of 76-82%. These figures are derived from heterogeneous, predominantly pilot studies and should not be interpreted as indicators of real-world effectiveness. Major implementation challenges included data quality issues (9/13 studies, 69%), algorithmic bias concerns (8/13, 62%), privacy and security barriers (7/13, 54%), and AI literacy gaps (10/13, 77%). Included studies suggest that AI may support several functions within public health dentistry; however, these conclusions are drawn from a small and heterogeneous evidence base dominated by pilot studies and narrative reviews, limiting generalisability to routine public health dental settings. Successful implementation will require addressing data quality, algorithmic transparency, workforce training, and ethical considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.