ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Memory load modulates the role of perception in category effects in visual working memory.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The origin of category effects in visual working memory (VWM) - whether they stem from perceptual factors - remains debated. The present study adopted an individual-differences approach to investigate how the magnitude of category effects relates to perceptual versus memory factors, as indexed by discrimination thresholds. Eighty participants completed two threshold tasks: one perceptual color discrimination task where two color patches were presented simultaneously, and one memory color discrimination task where patches were presented sequentially. They also performed a delayed estimation task, the performance of which was decomposed into categorical and continuous memory components. Results revealed that the strength of category effects was significantly larger under set size 3 compared to set size 1. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that both perception discrimination thresholds and memory discrimination thresholds uniquely predicted the strength of category effects when memory set size was 1, with higher thresholds associated with stronger category effects. However, when memory set size increased to 3, only memory discrimination thresholds uniquely predicted the strength of category effects, while its relationship with perceptual discrimination thresholds disappeared. These findings suggest that, when memory load was only one item, category effects may be partly contributed by perceptual factors. However, under higher memory loads, no reliable association was observed between perceptual factors and category effects. These findings suggest that memory load could modulate the relative contribution of perceptual and memory factors to category effects in visual working memory. OPEN PRACTICES STATEMENT: The trial-level data and experiment code for this study are publicly available at: https://osf.io/j5n7v/?view_only=8ffc5785136d4775be177929d18b01e1 . The experiment was not preregistered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42618861What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.