ReviewLung2026
Update 2026: Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Review in Lung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a biologically aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma characterized by early metastatic spread, frequent relapse, and poor long-term survival. After several decades of limited progress, recent therapeutic advances have begun to reshape management across disease stages. In limited-stage SCLC, concurrent platinum-etoposide chemoradiotherapy remains the backbone of curative-intent treatment, while consolidation durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy has established a new standard for patients without disease progression. In extensive-stage SCLC, platinum-etoposide plus a PD-L1 inhibitor remains the preferred first-line approach. For selected patients, maintenance lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab and second-line tarlatamab have expanded treatment options beyond conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Intracranial management is also evolving, with greater emphasis on baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging, longitudinal surveillance, selective use of prophylactic cranial irradiation, stereotactic radiosurgery in appropriate patients, and neuroprotective strategies during whole-brain radiotherapy. Biologically, SCLC is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disease. Transcriptional subtypes, DLL3, B7-H3, SEZ6, SLFN11, and circulating tumor DNA are informing clinical trial design and may help refine future treatment selection. This review provides a clinically oriented overview of current standards and emerging therapeutic strategies in SCLC, with attention to evidence quality, toxicity, sequencing, and clinical applicability. It also discusses key unresolved questions that must be addressed before biomarker-directed and subtype-informed treatment can be integrated into routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.