ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Machine learning-based prediction of peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis in hematological malignancies: development and validation of a dynamic model in a multicenter cohort.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePeripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis (PICC-RT) is a common and serious complication in patients with hematological malignancies, leading to treatment interruptions and increased morbidity. Traditional risk assessment models are often static and lack hematology-specific predictors, resulting in suboptimal performance. We aimed to develop and validate a robust machine learning (ML) model that integrates static clinical data with dynamic biomarkers to provide individualized risk prediction.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study screened 5420 patients, ultimately including 4015 adult patients with hematological malignancies who underwent PICC insertion across five participating centers. The cohort was randomly partitioned into a training set (n = 2810) and an independent testing set (n = 1205). Nine core predictors were selected via LASSO regression. We compared three algorithms, logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and XGBoost, using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were utilized for model interpretation.
resultsThe incidence of symptomatic PICC-RT was 5.8% (n = 232). In the independent testing set, the XGBoost model significantly outperformed the LR baseline (AUC: 0.862 [95% CI: 0.825-0.899] vs. 0.774 [95% CI: 0.730-0.818], P < 0.001). Independent predictors identified included history of VTE, use of triple-lumen catheters, immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) use, and peak values of D-dimer and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). SHAP analysis revealed a distinct threshold effect for peak D-dimer, where risk accelerated sharply once levels exceeded 1.5 mg/L. To provide a balanced predictive profile given the low baseline incidence, the model demonstrated a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.6% alongside a positive predictive value (PPV) of 18.8%. An open-access, web-based risk calculator was developed to facilitate clinical application (freely available at https://xxcc1114.shinyapps.io/PICC_Calculator/ ).
conclusionsThe XGBoost model, integrating dynamic biomarkers and hematology-specific factors, provides superior personalized risk stratification for PICC-RT. This tool enables the identification of high-risk patients who may benefit from enhanced surveillance or targeted thromboprophylaxis while safely identifying low-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42618846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.