Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618835›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2026

Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: From Epidemiologic Shift to Life-Course Carcinogenesis and Age-Attuned Care.

Magda Grześkiewicz-Szostak, Katarzyna Gęca, Magdalena Skórzewska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magda Grześkiewicz-Szostak *Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna Gęca *Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. kasiaa.geca@gmail.com.
Magdalena SkórzewskaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewEarly-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), conventionally defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years, has become one of the most important and unsettling epidemiologic shifts in gastrointestinal oncology. This review critically synthesizes recent evidence on EOCRC epidemiology, risk architecture, life-course carcinogenesis, molecular and microbiome-associated mechanisms, diagnostic delay, screening limitations, treatment considerations, and survivorship needs, with the aim of reframing EOCRC as an age-attuned clinical and biological challenge rather than a simple early presentation of conventional colorectal cancer. RECENT

findingsRecent population-based analyses confirm that EOCRC incidence is increasing across multiple countries and birth cohorts, with a disproportionate contribution of distal colon and rectal cancers. These data suggest that the rise of EOCRC is unlikely to be explained by improved detection alone and instead points toward changing generational exposures. Contemporary studies have moved the field beyond hereditary predisposition as the dominant explanatory model: although germline syndromes remain essential to identify, most EOCRC is sporadic or incompletely explained by known inherited risk. Recent literature increasingly implicates metabolic dysfunction, obesity, westernized dietary patterns, early-life exposures, inflammation, antibiotic-associated microbial disruption, and host-microbiome disequilibrium. Particularly important are emerging genomic data linking colibactin-associated mutational signatures to younger-onset disease, supporting the hypothesis that microbial genotoxicity may imprint early driver events long before clinical diagnosis. In parallel, recent clinical studies show that EOCRC is frequently symptomatic, yet diagnosis is commonly delayed because alarm features such as rectal bleeding, abdominal pain, altered bowel habits, and anaemia are often underestimated in younger adults. EOCRC is best understood as a heterogeneous, life-course disease shaped by the convergence of inherited susceptibility, environmental and metabolic exposures, microbiome-mediated biology, tumour site, diagnostic-system factors, and survivorship context. Lowering the average-risk screening age to 45 years is necessary but insufficient, because many cases still occur below routine screening thresholds. A modern EOCRC strategy must therefore combine risk-adapted prevention, improved family-history capture, timely investigation of red-flag symptoms, systematic germline and tumour profiling, and treatment planning that accounts for decades of survivorship. Future progress will depend on moving beyond age alone toward integrated models that connect epidemiology, exposome biology, microbial mutagenesis, precision early detection, and age-specific care.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAge of OnsetCarcinogenesisGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansRisk FactorsCcolorectal cancer screeningColibactinDiagnostic delayEearly-onset colorectal cancerHereditary predispositionLife-course carcinogenesisMicrobiomePrecision preventionSurvivorshipYoung-onset colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID42618835
PMCPMC13490218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.