Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618828›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026

Comment on "Anatomical basis of the neurotization of the brachialis muscle to the extensor carpi radialis muscles to restore an active extension of the tetraplegic wrist".

Meghna Guha, Anudeep Kaur, Vilhoubeinuo Veronica Khruomo

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meghna GuhaRadiography and Advance Imaging Technology, The Assam Royal Global University, Assam, India. meghnaguha21march@gmail.com.
Anudeep KaurRadiography and Advance Imaging Technology, The Assam Royal Global University, Assam, India.
Vilhoubeinuo Veronica KhruomoRadiography and Advance Imaging Technology, The Assam Royal Global University, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoring wrist extension in patients with tetraplegia is a critical surgical objective, as it enables tenodesis and facilitates independent grasping. Ollivier et al. recently presented an anatomical study evaluating the feasibility of neurotization of the brachialis muscle nerve to branches of the extensor carpi radialis muscles for this purpose. Their findings confirm that the transfer is anatomically feasible but typically requires an interposed nerve graft, with average graft lengths of approximately 83 mm for the extensor carpi radialis longus and 121.5 mm for the extensor carpi radialis brevis. This commentary discusses several important considerations arising from these findings, including the potential impact of long nerve grafts on axonal regeneration and functional recovery, the significance of variable radial nerve branching patterns on individualized surgical planning, and the need to preserve brachioradialis function. The relative merits of nerve transfer versus established tendon transfer techniques are also examined. While the anatomical evidence supports the feasibility of this neurotization approach, prospective clinical trials are necessary to evaluate functional outcomes, strength recovery, and patient quality of life before this technique can be recommended for routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalNerve TransferQuadriplegiaWristWrist JointHumansRadial NerveRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionTendon TransferTenodesisBrachialis muscleExtensor carpi radialisNerve transferTetraplegiaUpper limb reconstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.