Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618815›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026

Interpregnancy interval and maternal postpartum depression and anxiety: findings from the APrON cohort.

Peighton Johnson, Nicole Letourneau, Maryam Kebbe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peighton JohnsonDepartment of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Nicole LetourneauDepartment of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Maryam KebbeDepartment of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7999-9299

Funding

Alberta Innovates Health Solutions
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shorter interpregnancy intervals (IPI) are linked to adverse maternal health outcomes, such as pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus. The link between IPI and maternal mental health has not been examined despite its potential clinical implications. The aim of this study was to examine associations between IPI and postpartum symptoms of depression (PPD) and anxiety (PPA). We retrieved data from the APrON study. Mothers (n = 613) completed the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale to assess depression and the Symptoms Checklist-90 to assess anxiety within 1 year of the second child's delivery. IPI was categorized into <6, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23, 24-59, and 60-119 months. Logistic generalized linear modeling was performed. Mothers ≥35 years of age had twice the odds of PPD (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.25-3.36, P = .0041) compared to mothers <35 years. Mothers with high social support had 54% lower odds of PPD (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.72, P = .00074) compared to mothers with low social support. Mothers with a history of PPD and/or PPA had 3× greater odds of PPD (OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.47-5.96, P = .0020) compared to those without a history. Social support postpartum and history of depression and/or anxiety were also associated with PPA (P < .05). IPI was not related to maternal PPD or PPA in this cohort. Comprehensive mental health support programs and resources are warranted not only postnatally, but prenatally and throughout gestation, particularly in older mothers and those with mental illness history.

Indexed as

AnxietyBirth IntervalsDepression, PostpartumMothersAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk FactorsSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID42618815
PMCPMC13489710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.