ReviewNature2026
Safety and security of large language models in healthcare.
Review in Nature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integration of artificial intelligence methods into clinical care is proceeding rapidly, driven by advances in generative artificial intelligence, most notably large language models. Large language models trained on large amounts of text have shown potential across nearly every domain of healthcare. However, their broad applicability also comes with new responsibilities, vulnerabilities and threats. These need to be assessed and mitigated before widespread clinical adoption. Here we review the available literature on security and safety of large language models themselves as well as their integration with hospital workflows and interactions with human healthcare providers. We systematically map security hazards to development stages of clinical artificial intelligence systems (design, data, model, inference and environment), identify safety layers, from core optimization objectives, knowledge integrity and alignment, to interaction with humans and systems, and classify threats by their current clinical relevance. Finally, we provide a perspective on current mitigation techniques, illustrating respective stakeholders' responsibilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42618758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.