Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618754›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2026

Strong and localized recurrence controls the dimensionality of neural activity across brain areas.

David Dahmen, Stefano Recanatesi, Xiaoxuan Jia, Gabriel K Ocker, Nilufar Lahiji, Simon Musall, Luke Campagnola, Stephanie Seeman, Tim Jarsky, Moritz Helias and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Revisiting the high-dimensional geometry of population responses in the visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Separating cognitive and motor processes in the behaving mouse.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David Dahmen *Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany. d.dahmen@fz-juelich.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7664-916X
Stefano Recanatesi *University of Washington Computational Neuroscience Center, Department of Applied Mathematics, and Swartz Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Seattle, WA, USA. stefano.recanatesi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-9261
Xiaoxuan JiaSchool of Life Sciences and IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-9331
Gabriel K OckerAllen Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9627-9576
Nilufar LahijiSystems Neurophysiology, Institute of Zoology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Simon MusallSystems Neurophysiology, Institute of Zoology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9461-1042
Luke CampagnolaAllen Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Stephanie SeemanAllen Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-1992
Tim JarskyAllen Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4399-539X
Moritz HeliasInstitute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.
Eric Shea-BrownUniversity of Washington Computational Neuroscience Center, Department of Applied Mathematics, and Swartz Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

From diverse dynamics to diverse computation via neural cell typesRF1DA055669 · NIDA · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI MIHALAS, STEFAN, SHEA-BROWN, ERIC TODD · 2021 to 2021
$1.1M
Models and Methods for Calcium Imaging Data with Application to the Allen Brain ObservatoryR01EB026908 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUICE, MICHAEL, WITTEN, DANIELA · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 368482240/GRK2416Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) SPP 2205 - 533396241EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 785907EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 945539Helmholtz Association VH-NG-1028Helmholtz Association VH-NG-1611NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026908NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA055669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain contains an astronomical number of neurons, but it is their collective activity that underlies brain function. The number of degrees of freedom that this activity explores (its dimensionality) is therefore a fundamental signature of neural dynamics. However, it is not known what controls dimensionality in the biological brain. Through analysis of high-density Neuropixels recordings, here, we argue that areas across the mouse cortex predominantly operate in a sensitive regime that gives recurrent synaptic networks a strong role in regulating dimensionality. This control is expressed across time, as cortical activity transitions among states with different dimensionalities. Moreover, this control is mediated through highly tractable features of synaptic networks (network motifs). Analyzing a massive synaptic physiology dataset, we find that motifs impacting dimensionality are prevalent in both mouse and human brains. Thus, local circuitry scales up systematically to help control the degrees of freedom that brain networks may explore and exploit.

Indexed as

BrainNerve NetNeuronsAnimalsHumansMiceModels, NeurologicalRecurrent Neural NetworksSynapses

Identifiers

PMID42618754
PMCPMC13633124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.