ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Total body irradiation across conditioning intensities: historical context, dose-fractionation strategy, and the role of the chemotherapy backbone.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total body irradiation (TBI) is a form of radiotherapy that provides a uniform dose of ionizing radiation to the entire body. It has been a mainstay of the conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for many decades. The clinical usefulness of TBI is based on the balance of its cytotoxic and immunosuppressive effects, which allow for the eradication of remaining malignant cells, including sanctuary sites, as well as the establishment of a successful transplant. Early "supra-lethal" single-dose schedules of TBI were highly effective but also came with a substantial treatment-related toxicity burden. As a result, fractionated doses of TBI were developed to improve the tolerability of the regimen. Currently, TBI is used as a component of the conditioning regimen for all three types of allo-HSCT conditioning: myeloablative conditioning (MAC, typically TBI ≥ 12 Gy or equivalent), nonmyeloablative conditioning (NMA, typically TBI ≤ 2 Gy), and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC, intermediate doses). The dose of TBI is intended to balance the efficacy of the regimen against non-relapse mortality (NRM). High doses of TBI are more effective in reducing the risk of relapse but also increase the risk of NRM, particularly in the elderly. The lowest doses of NMA, typically 2 Gy, have expanded the scope of allo-HSCT but may be insufficient for durable disease control in high-risk disease because relapse remains a major cause of failure. intermediate TBI doses (4-8 Gy) are used in reduced or intermediate-intensity platforms to enhance antileukemic activity while limiting toxicity relative to fully myeloablative regimens. It is important to note that the outcomes of the regimen are not determined by TBI dose only, but by the interaction among dose/fractionation, the chemotherapy backbone, disease status, and transplant platform. The available data suggests a need for a platform-specific dose-adapted regimen of TBI rather than a standard dose.
Identifiers
42618730What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.