ArticleAdvances in therapy2026
BRIDGE-2M: Optimizing Bridging Therapy Prior to CAR-T Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Modified Double-Blind Delphi Panel of US Physicians.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe aimed to achieve consensus on optimal bridging therapy (BT) selection for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy.
methodsWe conducted a double-blind, three-round modified Delphi panel among U.S.-based hematologist-oncologists/hematologists using CAR-T therapy for RRMM.
resultsPanelists (N = 15; all managing -60-100 patients with RRMM within the past year; > 5 years of practice: 86.7%) reached consensus on key attributes influencing BT selection (disease burden, aggressive disease, performance status, comorbidities, line of therapy, age, frailty). Unique patient attributes were linked to clinical objectives (≥ 65 years or frailty: disease stabilization [71% consensus]; poor performance status: end-organ function preservation; comorbidities: functional preservation; high disease burden: preventing clinical decline; aggressive disease: cytoreduction [all 100% consensus]). Goals of BT were to decrease disease burden and promote CAR-T efficacy and safety (100% consensus). While talquetamab was preferred for bridging in later lines (66.7%), 73.3% would consider earlier-line use if approved.
conclusionThis study synthesized expert physician perspectives to develop a consensus-based framework to optimize BT selection, linking five key patient attributes to clinical objectives, with goals extending beyond disease stabilization to enhancing CAR-T efficacy and safety. Graphical abstract available for this article 10.6084/m9.figshare.33016328.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42618714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.