ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning for nanoscience scanning electron microscope image classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Materials science investigates the relationships between a material's structure, properties, and fabrication processes. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) techniques have significantly enhanced the ability to analyze complex visual data, particularly in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. These approaches enable the detection of subtle morphological patterns that may not be easily identified through manual inspection, facilitating more accurate characterization of nanomaterials. In this study, a multi-class classification framework is proposed for SEM images of nanostructures, categorized into nanowires, fibers, and tips (NFT). To address the issue of class imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was incorporated using two complementary strategies: pixel-level and feature-level representations. In the pixel-level approach, synthetic samples were generated directly from flattened image data, while in the feature-level approach, deep features were first extracted using a pre-trained ResNet50 model before applying SMOTE. For classification, transfer learning was employed using three convolutional neural network architectures: SqueezeNet, ShuffleNet, and GoogLeNet. In addition, a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) classifier was used for feature-level representations. The experimental results demonstrate that both SMOTE strategies effectively address class imbalance, while the pixel-level approach achieved the highest classification performance. The pixel-level approach achieved a classification accuracy of up to 98.35% using GoogLeNet and ShuffleNet, whereas the feature-level approach achieved an accuracy of 97.44% while offering a computationally efficient alternative. These findings highlight the effectiveness of combining SMOTE with transfer learning for handling imbalanced SEM datasets and illustrate the trade-off between classification performance and computational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.