Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618681›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Prioritising construction accident risk factors using an integrated Random Forest, XGBoost, and ANN framework with sensitivity analysis.

Abdulaziz Alotaibi, John Gambatese, Hossam Wefki, Abdulaziz Alqurashi, Mohamed T Elnabwy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdulaziz AlotaibiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah, 42351, Saudi Arabia. Abdulaziz.Alotaibi@iu.edu.sa.ORCID 0000-0002-9700-2824
John GambateseSchool of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Hossam WefkiCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Port Said, 42526, Egypt.
Abdulaziz AlqurashiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah, 42351, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed T ElnabwySchool of Architecture and Built Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Construction safety remains a critical concern due to accidents influenced by multiple interacting factors. While previous studies have identified key risk drivers, robust, data-driven approaches for prioritising them remain limited. This study proposes an integrated machine learning and sensitivity-based framework to systematically prioritise construction accident risk factors. A dataset of key safety-related variables was analysed using Random Forest Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Artificial Neural Networks. Model performance was evaluated using standard metrics, and sensitivity analysis quantified the relative importance of each risk factor. Within the available dataset, the Random Forest model achieved the highest observed test correlation coefficient of 0.813; however, statistical testing did not indicate significant differences between model prediction errors. Sensitivity analysis revealed that physical strain sub-factors, particularly mechanical and electrical strain, gravity-related tasks, and motion-related exertion, collectively account for 33.74% of the total influence on predicted accident risk. Cognitive demand factors, specifically perceived time pressure and workflow interruptions, represent the most influential secondary drivers. The top five sub-factors alone account for nearly half of the cumulative risk impact, providing a preliminary, data-driven basis for targeted safety interventions within the studied context, subject to further validation with larger, more geographically diverse datasets. The proposed framework offers a promising decision-support tool for construction stakeholders, enabling data-driven prioritisation of safety risks and supporting more informed resource allocation for risk mitigation, subject to further validation in real industrial environments.

Indexed as

AccidentsConstruction IndustryNeural Networks, ComputerBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRisk FactorsAccident risk factorArtificial neural networkCognitive factorsConstruction safetyEnvironmental factorsMachine learningPhysical strainRandom forestRisk prioritisationXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42618681
PMCPMC13490401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.