ArticleNature medicine2026
Large-scale AI-guided liver malignancy diagnosis: multicenter study and a single-arm trial.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07153783 (AI-human Collaborative Diagnosis of Liver Tumors Using CE-CT), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
AI-human Collaborative Diagnosis of Liver Tumors Using CE-CT
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the breakthrough for RAS-driven cancers.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liver malignancies are frequently evaluated on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), but missed or delayed diagnoses remain a clinically important challenge in high-volume, real-world radiology workflows, highlighting the need for scalable diagnostic safety net approaches. To address this, we developed the Liver DiagnOsis Network (LiON), a CE-CT-based artificial intelligence (AI) system that supports flexible multiphase processing, clinical data integration and workflow-compatible liver malignancy diagnosis. LiON was trained on 6,443 patients and retrospectively validated across 22,251 patients from multicenter and real-world cohorts. LiON achieved high performance for malignancy diagnosis, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.975 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.971-0.979), and maintained robust performance in real-world cohorts and among patients with hepatic steatosis (AUC 0.971, 95% CI: 0.952-0.985) and cirrhosis (AUC 0.924, 95% CI: 0.901-0.946). We then conducted a single-arm trial in 10,333 patients in routine clinical practice, in which LiON functioned as an additional AI reader within the existing clinical workflow. The trial met its primary endpoint, defined as an AUC for malignancy diagnosis with the lower bound of the 95% CI exceeding 0.900, achieving an AUC of 0.952 (95% CI: 0.942-0.961). Secondary outcomes demonstrated that AI-human collaboration identified 51 previously overlooked lesions (15 malignancies) and triggered 37 amended radiology reports, 22 multidisciplinary team escalations and clinical management changes in a subset of patients. These findings suggest that AI, when deployed as a workflow-compatible diagnostic support, may help reduce missed or delayed diagnoses and guide clinical interventions. Nevertheless, further evidence from prospective comparative studies across diverse healthcare systems is warranted to assess effects on clinical outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07153783 .
Identifiers
42618635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.