ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
The protective role of memory suppression in psychological resilience among young adults with childhood trauma.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying psychological resilience following childhood trauma remain unclear. This study investigated whether memory suppression-the ability to inhibit unwanted memories voluntarily-serves as a key mechanism promoting resilience, and examined its neural correlates. An online survey of 2914 students assessed childhood trauma, resilience, and memory suppression ability, revealing that suppression ability significantly mediated the trauma-resilience relationship. Subsequently, 91 participants (grouped by trauma exposure and resilience levels) underwent fMRI during a Think/No-Think task. Behaviorally, high-resilience individuals exhibited superior memory suppression. Neuroimaging identified the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) as a critical neural substrate, showing enhanced suppression-related activity in high-resilience individuals and mediating the association between suppression performance and resilience. Additionally, the left IPS displayed increased functional connectivity with cognitive control regions and decreased connectivity with memory-related regions during suppression, with no significant differences between groups. These results establish memory suppression as a central component of resilience and highlight the left IPS as a key neural adaptor, suggesting its potential as a target for clinical intervention.
Identifiers
42618602What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.