ArticleSignal transduction and targeted therapy2026
Biallelic loss of RB1 in hepatocellular carcinoma as synthetic lethal target for artificial intelligence-guided therapy.
Article in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The retinoblastoma (RB1) gene is a critical tumor suppressor that regulates cell cycle progression and genomic stability. Although RB1 alterations have been reported in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the biological and clinical consequences of biallelic RB1 inactivation (RB1-Bi) remain poorly defined. We performed a comprehensive allele-specific genomic analysis of HCC patients from the TCGA-LIHC (n = 355) and in-house AMC (n = 206) cohorts, collectively comprising the AMC-TCGA discovery cohort. In this combined cohort, RB1-Bi was identified in 14.6% of tumors, was enriched in poorly differentiated HCCs and was independently associated with significantly reduced overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 3.32, 95% CI 1.93-5.72, p < 0.001). Additionally, a deep learning-based histopathology model using hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides (i.e., FR-MIL model) accurately predicted RB1-Bi status (F1 score 84.39% [95% CI, ±0.02]), making it readily identifiable in routine clinical practice. The prevalence and prognostic impact of RB1-Bi, as well as FR-MIL model performance, were consistent across independent validation cohorts, including advanced-stage tumors and external institutions. High-throughput drug screening in isogenic HCC models revealed that RB1-Bi HCC cells were particularly sensitive to inhibitors targeting mitotic regulators (e.g., AURKA, PLK1, KSP) and DNA damage response pathways (e.g., PARP inhibitors). Synthetic lethal interactions between RB1-Bi and these compounds were demonstrated in vitro and in vivo, and combination treatment with mitotic and PARP inhibitors had synergistic effects with acceptable tolerability. We conclude that RB1-Bi represents a clinically actionable biomarker that identifies a high-risk HCC subtype with specific therapeutic vulnerabilities, offering new opportunities for precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.