Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618288›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2026

Development and evaluation of AI-based clinical decision support system for streamlining breast multidisciplinary team meetings.

Hannah Jeffery, Aaditya Prakash Sinha, Belul Shifa, Georgina Bitsakou, Mark Harries, Elinor Sawyer, Sarah Pinder, Wen Ng, Ali Sever, Sultana Hasso and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hannah Jeffery *King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2305-6969
Aaditya Prakash Sinha *School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8930-593X
Belul ShifaGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5955-8390
Georgina BitsakouGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mark HarriesGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5221-8592
Elinor SawyerKing's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8285-4111
Sarah PinderKing's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4167-8910
Wen NgGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ali SeverGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6955-0789
Sultana HassoGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Maria JavedGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6057-8547
Priya DevadasGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2310-197X
Qurratulain ChougleGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-4852
Neyaf AlmajaliGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2447-8183
Mohamed AttiaGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7306-7140
Mariam MalikGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1664-4524
Mangesh A ThoratGuy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8673-5320
Vivekanand PatkarDeontics Intelligent Healthcare, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9772-4374
Arnie PurushothamKing's College London, London, UK arnie.purushotham@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-9655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMultidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings are key to delivering cancer care. Increasing caseload and limited resources make them less effective and unsustainable. The aim of this quality improvement project was to assess novel artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support (CDS) technology to develop and validate standard of care (SoC) to streamline the breast MDT meetings in a tertiary cancer centre.

methodsA clinical governance group of the MDT approved international guidelines used to develop SoC. Deontics CDS was assessed for its suitability to apply the SoC pathway for benign and malignant breast disease with the exclusion of metastatic and recurrent cancer.

resultsPatients discussed over the preceding 16 months were added to the platform in cohorts of 50 women: two consisting of 50 women each diagnosed with benign disease (benign A and B: n=100) and three consisting of 50 women each diagnosed with malignant disease (cancer A, B and C: n=150). Concordance between the blinded MDT decision outcomes and SoC recommendations was analysed. This stepwise approach identified knowledge gaps in SoC and refined the CDS. Concordance improved from 82% to 100% in benign and from 94% to 100% in malignant cases. DISCUSSION: A sequential process of validating the SoC with data derived from the development of evidence-based SoC protocols based on international guidelines resulted in a final 100% concordance rate between the platform and MDT recommendations for both benign and malignant disease.

conclusionsCDS technology could be a milestone in using SoC to deliver a sustainable clinical decision pathway.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalPatient Care TeamFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality ImprovementArtificial intelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDelivery of Health CarePatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID42618288
PMCPMC13504842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.