Observational studyEndocrine journal2026
Observational study of the relationship between the use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control in patients with diabetes in Japan: the REALJ study.
Observational study in Endocrine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM), evidence from routine clinical practice remains limited, particularly in Asian populations. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rtCGM initiation in individuals with diabetes. This multicenter, single-arm, retrospective, observational study was conducted at 34 sites across Japan (Clinical trial registration: UMIN000054275). Adults ≥18 years of age with diabetes who began using the Dexcom G6 rtCGM system, had a baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level ≥7.5%, and continued rtCGM for at least 26 weeks were included. Factors associated with changes in HbA1c levels were examined using multivariate linear regression models. Among 192 participants, the mean HbA1c levels at 26 weeks were significantly lower (8.62 ± 1.14% vs. 7.88 ± 1.16%, p < 0.001) than those at baseline, with a difference of -0.73 ± 1.03%. In the multivariate analysis, greater HbA1c reduction was independently associated with higher baseline HbA1c (β = -0.40; p < 0.001), longer CGM active time (β = -0.008; p = 0.043), and older age (β = -0.010; p = 0.012), whereas prior isCGM use was associated with smaller reductions (β = +0.28; p = 0.045). Sex was also independently associated with changes in HbA1c levels (p = 0.028). During the 26-week follow-up period, one patient (0.5%) experienced diabetic ketoacidosis and four individuals (2.1%) experienced severe hypoglycemia. rtCGM initiation was associated with significantly lower HbA1c levels after 26 weeks of rtCGM use. These findings support the efficacy and safety of the Dexcom G6 in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.