ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis
Evaluating effects of feedback on college students' self-reports of alcohol consumption and standard drink free-pours.
Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating effects of feedback on college students' self-reports of alcohol consumption and standard drink free-pours.Journal of applied behavior analysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Excessive alcohol consumption is a concern on college campuses, yet most data are gathered from self-report surveys, which require college students to identify standard drink sizes. Unfortunately, they typically cannot define or pour standard drinks, rendering the reliability and validity of these data questionable. Researchers have suggested the provision of feedback to college students might improve these skills. However, evidence for this is limited by lack of repeated measures, little evaluation of the effects of feedback on observable behavior (e.g., free-pour), and aggregate data. The current study used a single-case design with repeated measures to examine the effects of feedback on individual college students' self-reports and free-pours. Mean values overestimated the accuracy of definitions and free-pours prior to feedback, a finding that has implications for interpreting alcohol research. Feedback improved free-pour accuracy of standard servings of 5% ABV beer (12 oz), although generalization to higher ABV beer did not occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.