SynthesisRMD open2026
Prevalence and clinical relevance of anti-drug antibodies in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the prevalence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and to evaluate associations with serum drug levels, clinical efficacy and safety.
methodsA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to September 2025. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies reporting ADA measurement in adults with PsA receiving bDMARDs were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions.
results28 studies (19 randomised controlled trials and 9 observational studies) were included. ADA prevalence varied widely between bDMARDs and across studies of the same drug and was not directly comparable due to immunoassay heterogeneity. The highest ADA prevalence was observed with adalimumab, infliximab and golimumab followed by ustekinumab, ixekizumab, certolizumab pegol and guselkumab, while secukinumab and etanercept demonstrated very low or absent immunogenicity. Across tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor studies, ADAs were consistently associated with lower serum drug levels and reduced clinical response, while concomitant methotrexate was associated with lower ADA prevalence. In contrast, serum drug level and clinical outcome data for interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors were limited or lacking. Immunogenicity-related adverse events were uncommon, and evidence was insufficient to establish an association with ADAs across bDMARDs.
conclusionADA prevalence in PsA varies widely between bDMARDs and across studies of the same bDMARD. ADAs appear most clinically relevant for TNF inhibitors, whereas evidence for other biological classes remains limited. Immunoassay heterogeneity limits comparability, highlighting the need for standardised prospective studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251121662.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.