Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618060›Full record

SynthesisJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2026

The Views and Experiences of Families and Registered Nurses Regarding Hospital Care and Support of Children With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

Amirah Gadi, Lynne Marsh, Michael Brown

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amirah GadiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9801-7227
Lynne MarshSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4296-1291
Michael BrownSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3230-401X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with intellectual disabilities experience poorer health outcomes and persistent inequities in hospital care. No previous review has integrated perspectives of families, registered nurses (RNs), nursing students and nurse educators to examine how family partnerships, workforce preparation and clinical practice intersect. This review synthesises evidence on hospital care and support for children with intellectual disabilities.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, four databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO and Embase) were searched from inception to October 2025. Study quality was appraised using the MMAT.

resultsTwenty-eight studies were included, generating five themes: the significance of communication, partnership and family empowerment, environmental and systemic barriers, the role of education and professional development and emotional and psychological well-being.

conclusionsImproving hospital care requires effective communication, meaningful family partnerships, supportive environments and reasonable adjustments, greater professional preparedness and emotional support. No eligible studies explored nursing students' or nurse educators' perspectives, revealing an evidence gap.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFamilyIntellectual DisabilityNursesChildHumanschildrenfamily‐centred carehospital careintellectual disabilitynursing educationnursing practice

Identifiers

PMID42618060
PMCPMC13489723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.