ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2026
[Professional Health Literacy Among Midwives - Findings from a Standardised Online Survey Conducted in Bavaria].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Womens health literacy before, during and after childbirth is of considerable public health importance. As midwives frequently serve as primary care providers and first professional contacts during this critical stage of life, they are strategically positioned to support and enhance women's health literacy. The effective fulfilment of this role, however, requires a well-developed level of professional health literacy among midwives themselves. Empirical evidence on this construct remains limited. The aim of this study was to provide a systematic assessment of professional health literacy among midwives in Bavaria. Methods: A cross-sectional design was applied using data from a standardised online survey conducted within the HELPER study. Between November 2023 and May 2024, 668 midwives practising in Bavaria participated. Professional health literacy was assessed using the PROF-HL-Q, a 34-item instrument covering four competency domains. Data were analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics, including independent samples t-tests and correlation analysis. Results: Mean scores across the four competency domains ranged from 48.6 to 78.0 (scale range: 0-100). Patient-centred communication achieved the highest mean scores and was perceived as the least challenging domain. In contrast, professional digital health literacy showed the lowest mean scores and was rated as the most challenging. Conclusion: The findings underline the pivotal role of midwives as providers of health-related information and guidance through-out the perinatal period. Simultaneously, domain-specific competency gaps were identified, indicating a need for curricular refinement in both pre-registration education and continuing professional development. Targeted measures, particularly in the areas of digital competencies, evidence-informed practice, and advanced communication skills, appear warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.