Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42617254›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Research note: Colorimetric phenotyping of bruises in broiler carcasses under commercial slaughterhouse conditions.

Aneta Jaszczyk, Patryk Sztandarski, Magdalena Solka, Jarosław O Horbańczuk, Grzegorz Pogorzelski, Adrianna Szprynca, Joanna Składanowska-Baryza, Agnieszka Ludwiczak, Weronika Goździejewska, Adrian Stelmasiak and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Aneta JaszczykInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.
Patryk SztandarskiInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland. Electronic address: p.sztandarski@igbzpan.pl.
Magdalena SolkaInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.
Jarosław O HorbańczukInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.
Grzegorz PogorzelskiInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.
Adrianna SzpryncaInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.
Joanna Składanowska-BaryzaDepartment of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Szydłowska 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland.
Agnieszka LudwiczakDepartment of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Szydłowska 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland.
Weronika GoździejewskaDepartment of Animal Breeding and Product Quality Assessment, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Szydłowska 50, 60-627 Poznań, Poland.
Adrian StelmasiakDepartment of Technique and Food Development, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof DamaziakDepartment of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-786, Warsaw, Poland.
Jagoba Rey GotxiInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.
Magdalena KrawczakInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.
Joanna MarchewkaInstitute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bruising in broiler carcasses is an important quality defect and a potential indicator of pre-slaughter handling conditions. This study evaluated the color properties of broiler carcass bruises using CIE L*a*b* and ΔE* parameters under commercial slaughterhouse conditions. A total of 79 carcass bruises with a diameter ≥1 cm were included in the analysis. These included 48 breast, 16 leg, and 15 wing bruises. Color was measured in the central area of each bruise using a portable colorimeter. Color parameters were compared among anatomical regions, and the optimal number of clusters was assessed using the gap statistic before k-means clustering of Z-score standardized CIE L*a*b* coordinates and ΔE* values. Significant anatomical differences were observed for a* and b*, but not for L* or ΔE*. Leg bruises showed a stronger red-yellow profile, whereas wing bruises shifted toward blue-purple discoloration. The gap statistic supported a three cluster solution, which identified three colorimetric profiles that were partly associated with anatomical location. These findings indicate that broiler carcass bruises are colorimetrically heterogeneous and that quantitative color assessment may support standardized bruise characterization at slaughterhouse.

Indexed as

Broiler chickenBruiseCIE L*a*b*ColorimetrySlaughterhouse

Identifiers

PMID42617254
PMCPMC13521017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.