ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Unraveling cell-cell communication through spatial transcriptomics: a review of computational methods.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) has enabled direct interrogation of cell-cell communication (CCC) within intact tissues, providing critical spatial context that is lost in single-cell RNA-sequencing-based inference and allowing more accurate identification of physically plausible and spatially organized interactions. A rapidly expanding community of computational tools has emerged to decode CCC from ST data. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the conceptual evolution and methodological landscape of spatial CCC inference, classifying existing approaches into two major trajectories. One trajectory, spatial pattern-based methods, assumes CCC events manifest as identifiable spatial patterns, such as colocalization, coordinated spatial signals, or higher-order spatial organization captured by deep learning models. The other trajectory, expression modulation-based approaches, assumes that CCC events influence the transcriptomic state of receiver cells. We systematically dissect their biological assumptions, statistical and deep learning frameworks, strengths, and limitations, and highlight emerging challenges in validation, benchmarking, multimodal integration, and tissue-specific modeling. Finally, we outline future directions toward achieving dynamic, multilayered reconstruction of inter- and intracellular communication, de novo signaling, and integrative multi-omics modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.