ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
A prediction model for functional outcome following rescue therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the association between key preoperative and intraoperative factors and 90-day functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) with rescue therapy, and to establish a prognostic model for estimating 90-day functional outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled AIS patients with EVT plus rescue therapy from January 2018 to December 2024. The primary endpoint was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score >2. Logistic regression identified predictors incorporated into a nomogram. Model performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Bootstrap resampling and 10-fold cross-validation assessed robustness.
resultsIn total, 445 individuals were analyzed (training: 312; validation: 133). Multivariable analysis identified glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; OR = 1.345, 95% CI: 1.145-1.608,
conclusionOur model integrating HbA1c, NIHSS, OPT, PRT, and refractory thrombectomy demonstrated acceptable performance in predicting 90-day outcomes after rescue therapy. However, as a development-phase model, its clinical applicability should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.