Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42617082›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Draft hybrid assembly and annotation of the Drosophila palustris and Drosophila subpalustris genomes.

William Dion, Emily Washeleski, Tessa E Steenwinkel, Emily Taylor, Prajakta P Kokate, Aidan VanDrie, Thomas Werner, Paul D Goetsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William DionSchool of Health, Human, and Biological Systems, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7697-9433
Emily WasheleskiSchool of Health, Human, and Biological Systems, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.
Tessa E SteenwinkelSchool of Health, Human, and Biological Systems, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.
Emily TaylorSchool of Health, Human, and Biological Systems, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.
Prajakta P KokateSchool of Health, Human, and Biological Systems, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4766-239X
Aidan VanDrieSchool of Health, Human, and Biological Systems, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.
Thomas WernerSchool of Health, Human, and Biological Systems, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8865-365X
Paul D GoetschSchool of Health, Human, and Biological Systems, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7120-0945

Funding

Michigan Technological UniversityNational Science Foundation CAREER 2238540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species within the quinaria group of the genus Drosophila are models for ecological genetic studies on topics that include morphological diversity, color pattern development, and feeding behavior. Drosophila palustris and Drosophila subpalustris are closely related members within the quinaria species group that differ primarily in subtle morphological and behavioral traits. To support future evolutionary genomic studies in drosophilids, we completed new draft hybrid assemblies and annotations of the D. palustris and D. subpalustris genomes. We obtained a fragmented assembly for D. palustris (N50 = 874 Kb) and a near chromosome-scale D. subpalustris assembly (N50 = 27.5 Mbp). Assembly contiguity, repeat content, and gene annotation compared well to other published quinaria group genomes. To demonstrate the utility of our hybrid assemblies, we performed whole-genome synteny and phylogenomic comparisons within the quinaria clade. When compared to the chromosome-level Drosophila innubila assembly, the median size of syntenic blocks among quinaria group genomes was approximately 1 Mbp, although this estimate was influenced by assembly contiguity. Phylogenomic analyses estimated that the 2 major branches of the quinaria group diverged ∼17.9 MYA, with D. palustris and D. subpalustris diverging ∼1 to 2 MYA. We expect that our D. palustris and D. subpalustris assemblies will provide important additions to studies of genome evolution within Drosophilidae.

Indexed as

DrosophilaGenome, InsectMolecular Sequence AnnotationAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenomicsPhylogenySyntenycomparative genomicsDrosophilidaehybrid assemblyphylogenomicsquinaria species groupsynteny

Identifiers

PMID42617082
PMCPMC13643797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.