Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42617058›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2026

Olfactory Cues and Patient Safety Behavior in Virtual Reality Medical Simulation: Controlled Trial.

Anna Junga, Pascal Kockwelp, Jennifer Dabel, Sönke Helmut Scherzer, Benjamin Risse, Markus Holling, Bernhard Marschall, Hendrik Friederichs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna JungaInstitute of Education and Student Affairs, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1A, Building A6, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany, 49 25183-41133, 49 25183-58933.ORCID 0000-0002-4165-9114
Pascal KockwelpInstitute for Geoinformatics & Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-9118-0929
Jennifer DabelInstitute of Education and Student Affairs, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1A, Building A6, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany, 49 25183-41133, 49 25183-58933.ORCID 0009-0001-6458-9702
Sönke Helmut ScherzerInstitute of Education and Student Affairs, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1A, Building A6, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany, 49 25183-41133, 49 25183-58933.ORCID 0000-0002-7197-2101
Benjamin RisseInstitute for Geoinformatics & Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5691-4029
Markus HollingDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2167-0789
Bernhard MarschallInstitute of Education and Student Affairs, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1A, Building A6, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany, 49 25183-41133, 49 25183-58933.ORCID 0000-0002-1354-8687
Hendrik FriederichsResearch Group Medical Education, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9671-5235

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based medical education is essential for improving patient safety. In virtual reality (VR)-based simulation, immersion is primarily generated through visual and auditory cues, while other sensory modalities are typically absent. This sensory limitation may reduce the emergence of authentic safety-relevant behaviors. Olfaction plays an important role in clinical reasoning, risk perception, and self-protective behavior and is closely linked to memory and emotion. Although olfactory cues have been shown to influence hand hygiene behavior in real or simulated environments, their targeted integration into fully immersive VR-based medical simulation has not been systematically examined. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether adding a real olfactory cue (disinfectant scent) to a fully virtual clinical simulation increases patient safety-relevant behavior, specifically hand hygiene compliance (hand disinfection and glove usage). Methods: In a controlled study at the University of Münster (during the winter term 2025-2026), 95 medical students participated in a VR-based clinical simulation. Study rooms were preassigned to either an olfactory intervention or a control condition, and participants selected their room without knowledge of the assigned condition (quasi-random allocation by room). Hand hygiene and glove use were automatically tracked as outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to assess the effect of the intervention on these behaviors. Results: The olfactory intervention nearly tripled the odds of hand disinfection (8/43, 18.6% vs 20/52, 38.5%; an absolute risk increase of 19.9 percentage points; OR=2.73, 95% CI 1.09-7.40; Conclusions: The integration of a real olfactory cue into a fully immersive VR medical simulation significantly increased hand disinfection behavior, particularly after patient contact, but did not affect glove use. These findings suggest that olfactory augmentation can selectively reinforce safety-relevant behaviors in digital training environments. Incorporating real-world sensory cues into VR may represent a simple yet effective design strategy to enhance behavioral authenticity and patient safety outcomes in simulation-based medical education.

Indexed as

CuesPatient SafetySimulation TrainingSmellVirtual RealityAdultFemaleHumansMaleStudents, Medicalbrain deathhand hygieneimmersionolfactorypatient safetysimulationundergraduate medical educationvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42617058
PMCPMC13489282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.