ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Built Environment Audits Across Space and Time for Estimating Time-Varying Exposures: Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Neighborhood disinvestment, characterized by built environment disrepair and deterioration, has been linked to health behaviors and outcomes, including cancer survival. However, disinvestment temporal dynamics, including time-lagged exposure estimates among colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, remain underexplored. Objective: This study aimed to describe and validate a spatiotemporal neighborhood audit protocol using Google Street View imagery, develop and compare predictive spatiotemporal models of neighborhood disinvestment, and examine time-lagged associations between disinvestment and CRC survival. Methods: We conducted 8256 virtual audits of Franklin County, Ohio, streetscapes sampled across locations and dates from 2009 to 2022 using 7 disinvestment indicators: garbage, graffiti, abandoned buildings, building conditions, yard conditions, road verge conditions, and large dumpsters. Of these, 5751 eligible location date audits were included. A neighborhood disinvestment score (NDS) was derived using item response theory. We fit spatiotemporal regression Kriging models with a simplified sum-metric covariance structure and compared two candidate models using out-of-sample root mean square prediction error (RMSPE): (1) a model incorporating major highways, waterways, and railways to define neighborhood boundaries, and (2) a traditional Kriging model allowing NDS to vary continuously across space and time. The best-fitting model was used to estimate NDS at the geocoded address and diagnosis date of 2727 CRC cases diagnosed from 2012 to 2019 and recorded within the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System. Covariates included age, sex, minoritized race-ethnicity, marital status, health insurance, and cancer stage at diagnosis (localized, regional, and distant). We built accelerated failure time models to estimate time ratios and 95% CIs for NDS averaged over 0-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month time lags. Models were adjusted for covariates. We tested stage by NDS interactions. Those alive through December 31, 2020, were right censored. Results: NDS exhibited substantial spatial but modest temporal variation, with spatial correlation measurable within 2.8 kilometers and temporal correlation up to 270 days. Traditional spatiotemporal Kriging outperformed the boundary-based model (RMSPE Conclusions: The spatiotemporal neighborhood audit approach is feasible and efficient. NDS varies appreciably across season, was accurately estimated using regression Kriging, and time-lagged exposures from 0 to 24 months produced negligible change in the NDS-CRC survival association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.