Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42616911›Full record

ArticleJournal of postgraduate medicine2026

A pathological analysis of pediatric pulmonary cystic/cavitary lesions.

V L Nanaware, P A Sathe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of postgraduate medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

V L NanawareDepartment of Pathology, Seth G. S. Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
P A Sathe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPediatric pulmonary cystic/cavitary lesions are uncommon. The spectrum of cystic/cavitary pulmonary lesions in pediatric patients includes congenital and acquired lesions. They have similar clinical presentation and overlapping radiologic features. Histopathology plays an important role in diagnosis. This study was planned to describe the spectrum of surgically resected cystic/cavitary pulmonary lesions in pediatric patients (age <12 years) and correlate clinical features with pathology findings. This is a single-center 10-year retrospective descriptive study. The cases were divided into two categories: congenital and acquired. Demographic details, clinical presentation, and investigational data were correlated with pathology findings.The study included 40 cases of surgically resected cystic/cavitary pulmonary lesions received from pediatric patients. Congenital lesions (22 cases, 55%) predominated over acquired lesions (18 cases, 45%). Cystic pulmonary airway malformation (29.2%, 12 cases) was the most common lesion and the most common cystic lesion overall. Acquired lesions included hydatid cyst (nine cases) and post infectious (post abscess) cavitary lesions (nine cases which included two cases of tuberculosis). Most congenital lesions were found in the neonates and infants and none found in late childhood, while most acquired lesions belonged to late childhood with no case found in neonates. Though radiology plays an important role in the diagnosis of cystic/cavitary lesions, histopathology is the key investigation for confirmation. Very few studies that describe the clinico-pathologic spectrum of these rare lesions in children were found in the literature.

Indexed as

LungLung DiseasesChildChild, PreschoolCystic Adenomatoid Malformation of Lung, CongenitalCystsEchinococcosis, PulmonaryFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesCavitycongenital pulmonary airway malformationcysthydatid cystlung

Identifiers

PMID42616911
PMCPMC13557519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.