ArticleeLife2026
Overt visual attention modulates decision-related signals in the frontal cortex.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When indicating a preference between two options, decision makers are thought to compare and accumulate evidence in an attention-guided process. Little is known about this process's neural substrates or how visual attention affects the representations of accumulated evidence. We conducted a simultaneous eye-tracking and fMRI experiment in which human subjects gradually learnt about the value of two food-lotteries. With this design, we were able to extend decisions over a prolonged time-course, manipulate the temporal onset of evidence, and therefore, dissociate sampled and accumulated evidence. We observed inconsistent correlations of both sampled and accumulated evidence with activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), the ventral striatum, and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and more consistent correlations of accumulated evidence with activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA). We also found that more gaze on an option increased its choice probability and that gaze consistently amplified accumulated-value signals above and beyond the non-gaze-modulated signals in the pre-SMA and partially in the dlPFC, providing novel evidence that visual attention has lasting effects on decision variables and suggesting that activity in the pre-SMA and dlPFC reflects gaze-weighted accumulated evidence. These results shed new light on the neural mechanisms underlying gaze-driven decision processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.