ArticlePloS one2026
An innovative care model for urgent and emergency care: A qualitative evaluation of community unscheduled care co-ordination hubs.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh demand for emergency care continues to place strain on ambulance services and emergency departments. Many patients present with acute problems that, while requiring an urgent response, do not require hospital care. Providing safe alternatives to hospital conveyance for these patients is a priority. Community unscheduled care co-ordination hubs (UCCH) support clinicians (e.g., paramedics) to identify and refer patients with acute care needs into community services, allowing patient care close to or in their own home and reducing ambulance callouts or conveyance to hospital. Our study identified the barriers and enablers to the operation and impact of UCCHs in three locations across England.
methodsTwenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinical and non-clinical staff working in UCCHs, and clinical staff working in services which refer patients into UCCHs (e.g., paramedics). Transcripts were analysed thematically.
resultsFour themes were identified: (1) UCCHs promote integrated community working by improving clinicians' access to rapid community-based support for patients; (2) there was a tension between maintaining easy access for referring clinicians and ensuring consistent referral decision-making, with unclear eligibility criteria creating uncertainty about the remit of UCCHs (3) UCCH staff perceived limited ambulance service engagement as a key barrier to maximising the service's impact on avoiding unnecessary hospital admissions; (4) Recruiting and retaining individuals with the right skills mix was a significant challenge, limiting the pace at which the UCCH could expand. DISCUSSION: UCCHs have the potential to simplify access to community services and support avoidance of unnecessary ED conveyance. However, their impact may be limited by inconsistent referral processes, variable engagement from ambulance services, and workforce challenges. Addressing these factors may enhance the effectiveness, sustainability, and scalability of UCCHs as part of wider efforts to deliver urgent care closer to home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.