ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Having conversations about alcohol in frontline healthcare services: Experiences and perceptions of consumers and healthcare staff.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alcohol-related harm is a global public health priority. To address a gap in the provision of screening, brief intervention and referral for treatment (SBIRT) in front-line healthcare services, a district health organisation based in South Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand, adapted and implemented a model of SBIRT called the Alcohol ABC Approach within general practices, maternity services, hospital emergency care, an inpatient ward, an outpatient clinic, and the district-wide community smoking cessation service. The Alcohol ABC approach aims to identify hazardous or harmful alcohol use in adult populations through routine, non-targeted assessment, provide brief advice and support to reduce alcohol consumption, refer people to support services where indicated, and prevent alcohol-related harm. A non-experimental, mixed methods, process and outcome evaluation examined the implementation, quality and outcomes of the programme to inform future delivery. Reflexive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with consumers (n = 8) and staff (n = 19) explored experiences and perceptions of conversations about alcohol and implementing the Alcohol ABC Approach. Findings highlight how social norms surrounding alcohol shape the acceptability of conversations, while relational practices grounded in whanaungatanga (relationship-building) and manaakitanga (care and respect) enable more meaningful dignity-enhancing engagement. Participants described conversations about alcohol as increasing awareness, supporting behaviour change, and challenging the normalisation of hazardous drinking. However, implicit and explicit biases, particularly ethnic bias, influenced who was asked about alcohol and how these conversations unfolded. Organisational support was essential for building staff skills and confidence to initiate discussions. These findings highlight the importance of equity-focused, culturally safe SBIRT approaches that address power and bias, and centre relationships in clinical encounters. While grounded in the context of Aotearoa New Zealand, this study offers insights for adapting and implementing alcohol harm reduction interventions in diverse settings, particularly those seeking to integrate decolonising and anti-racist principles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.