Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42616727›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

How artists experience their own art.

Giulia Tomasetig, Lucia Maria Sacheli, Margherita Adelaide Musco, Stefano Pizzi, Gianpaolo Basso, Grazia Fernanda Spitoni, Gabriella Bottini, Luigi Pizzamiglio, Eraldo Paulesu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giulia TomasetigDepartment of Psychology and Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMi), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5345-4178
Lucia Maria SacheliDepartment of Psychology and Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMi), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Margherita Adelaide MuscoDepartment of Psychology and Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMi), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-9091
Stefano PizziCentro Internazionale di Brera, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaolo BassoSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Grazia Fernanda SpitoniDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gabriella BottiniDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Luigi PizzamiglioDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Eraldo PaulesuDepartment of Psychology and Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMi), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humanity has always admired and created art, but the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying artistic experience remain elusive. Professional artists and their intimate relationship with their artworks provide a unique opportunity to study the nature of the art experience, given their expertise in both art-making and art appreciation. During two fMRI tasks, professional artists (N = 20) made aesthetic judgments on their own and other artists' paintings (aesthetic judgment task); they also mentally reconstructed the moments when they conceived their artworks or, as a control condition, when they visited for the first time now-familiar places (reconstruction by imagery task). During aesthetic judgments of their own (as compared to other artists') paintings, participants showed stronger recruitment of bilateral posterior parietal cortices, the left lateral occipitotemporal cortex, and the dorso-central sector of the right insula, that is, action-related brain regions also involved in encoding the emotional components of movements. The reconstruction of their own artistic creation (compared with episodic memory retrieval connected with places) involved the left fronto-parietal network associated with motor cognition, providing evidence that the sensorimotor dimension may be intrinsically entailed in the creative process. Moreover, the aesthetic judgments attributed to one's own artworks positively covaried with activity in the right dorsal premotor cortex during creative reconstruction, suggesting that aesthetic value may be linked to the reactivation of sensorimotor components associated with the creative gesture. Altogether, these results hint that the mental representations of the actions involved in creating art are integral to the overall artistic experience of painters, from conception to appreciation, supporting an embodied view of the artists' experience of art.

Indexed as

ArtEstheticsPaintingsAdultBrainBrain MappingCreativityFemaleHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42616727
PMCPMC13489410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.