ArticlePloS one2026
How artists experience their own art.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humanity has always admired and created art, but the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying artistic experience remain elusive. Professional artists and their intimate relationship with their artworks provide a unique opportunity to study the nature of the art experience, given their expertise in both art-making and art appreciation. During two fMRI tasks, professional artists (N = 20) made aesthetic judgments on their own and other artists' paintings (aesthetic judgment task); they also mentally reconstructed the moments when they conceived their artworks or, as a control condition, when they visited for the first time now-familiar places (reconstruction by imagery task). During aesthetic judgments of their own (as compared to other artists') paintings, participants showed stronger recruitment of bilateral posterior parietal cortices, the left lateral occipitotemporal cortex, and the dorso-central sector of the right insula, that is, action-related brain regions also involved in encoding the emotional components of movements. The reconstruction of their own artistic creation (compared with episodic memory retrieval connected with places) involved the left fronto-parietal network associated with motor cognition, providing evidence that the sensorimotor dimension may be intrinsically entailed in the creative process. Moreover, the aesthetic judgments attributed to one's own artworks positively covaried with activity in the right dorsal premotor cortex during creative reconstruction, suggesting that aesthetic value may be linked to the reactivation of sensorimotor components associated with the creative gesture. Altogether, these results hint that the mental representations of the actions involved in creating art are integral to the overall artistic experience of painters, from conception to appreciation, supporting an embodied view of the artists' experience of art.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.