Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42616708›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Quantifying wing wear in bumble bees using fractal geometry.

Ivan Nirmalaraj, Nicholas Sookhan, J Scott MacIvor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivan NirmalarajDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2076-1834
Nicholas SookhanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Scott MacIvorDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wing wear in bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) accumulates through flight activity and can serve as a proxy for foraging effort and age, yet methods for quantifying wear rely on coarse categorical scoring or simple geometric measurements that do not capture the complexity of wing edge degradation. We evaluate fractal dimension (FD) analysis as a quantitative morphometric for assessing wing wear and evaluate its relationship with visual scoring and body size. Unlike linear wing metrics, FD can capture subtle irregularities, yet no study has used FD to quantify wing wear in insects. We use forewing images collected from 263 workers of three North American bumble bee species (Bombus impatiens, B. bimaculatus, and B. rufocinctus) across meadows in Rouge National Urban Park (Toronto, Canada) to compare FD to traditional measures of wing condition, including wing wear scores and perimeter-area ratio. We found that FD of undamaged wings varied between species indicating interspecific variation in wing morphology. Furthermore, damaged wings correlated more strongly with visual wear scores than perimeter-area ratio, and unlike perimeter-area ratio, was not confounded by body size. Our findings highlight FD as a sensitive quantitative morphometric for wing wear and a promising tool for measurement of bee body condition, age, and foraging effort.

Indexed as

FractalsWings, AnimalAnimalsBeesBody Size

Identifiers

PMID42616708
PMCPMC13489438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.