ArticlePloS one2026
Quantifying wing wear in bumble bees using fractal geometry.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wing wear in bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) accumulates through flight activity and can serve as a proxy for foraging effort and age, yet methods for quantifying wear rely on coarse categorical scoring or simple geometric measurements that do not capture the complexity of wing edge degradation. We evaluate fractal dimension (FD) analysis as a quantitative morphometric for assessing wing wear and evaluate its relationship with visual scoring and body size. Unlike linear wing metrics, FD can capture subtle irregularities, yet no study has used FD to quantify wing wear in insects. We use forewing images collected from 263 workers of three North American bumble bee species (Bombus impatiens, B. bimaculatus, and B. rufocinctus) across meadows in Rouge National Urban Park (Toronto, Canada) to compare FD to traditional measures of wing condition, including wing wear scores and perimeter-area ratio. We found that FD of undamaged wings varied between species indicating interspecific variation in wing morphology. Furthermore, damaged wings correlated more strongly with visual wear scores than perimeter-area ratio, and unlike perimeter-area ratio, was not confounded by body size. Our findings highlight FD as a sensitive quantitative morphometric for wing wear and a promising tool for measurement of bee body condition, age, and foraging effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.