ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2026
Thumb Carpometacarpal Instability: An International Survey on Terminology, Diagnostic Workup, and Treatment.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThumb carpometacarpal (CMC) instability is a controversial topic in hand surgery. This international survey examined the terminology, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies used by surgeons worldwide, and explored variations by geographic region and surgical specialty.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was developed in collaboration with experienced hand surgeons and approved by the research committees of the Federation of European Societies for Surgery of the Hand and the American Association for Hand Surgery. The survey was distributed globally. Responses were analyzed by region and specialty.
resultsResponses were obtained from 208 surgeons across 38 countries. Most preferred the term 'Thumb CMC instability' (77%), whereas 16% used 'Stage I thumb CMC arthritis'. Encounter frequency varied widely, with responses ranging from daily (3%) to rarely (34%). Diagnosis was primarily based on clinical assessment of laxity, supported by radiographs (96%). Nonsurgical management was most commonly selected as first-line treatment (88%), with most surgeons proceeding to surgery only if symptoms persisted (76%). A wide range of surgical techniques was reported, with Eaton-Littler ligament reconstruction used most frequently (32%). U.S. surgeons reported encountering CMC instability more frequently than European surgeons. Choice of surgical technique differed by specialty, with plastic surgeons favoring ligament reconstruction and orthopedic surgeons more often selecting salvage procedures or arthroscopy.
conclusionsThumb CMC instability is widely recognized but remains inconsistently defined, diagnosed, and managed. These findings highlight opportunities to improve and standardize care. We advise consistent use of the term 'thumb CMC instability' to improve communication in clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.