Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42616679›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

SMART: structured, meaningful, auditable, responsible, and transparent documentation for clinical AI.

Ankur Lohachab, Frédéric Jung, Stef Rommes, Gökhan Ertaylan, Anshu Ankolekar, Visara Urovi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ankur LohachabInstitute of Data Science, Department of Advanced Computing Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 GS, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5291-7860
Frédéric JungEnvironmental Intelligence, Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO), 2400 Mol, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0001-6383-178X
Stef RommesEnvironmental Intelligence, Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO), 2400 Mol, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9072-582X
Gökhan ErtaylanEnvironmental Intelligence, Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek (VITO), 2400 Mol, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5602-6435
Anshu AnkolekarD-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW - Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 ER, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7681-1254
Visara UroviInstitute of Data Science, Department of Advanced Computing Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 GS, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2817-3950

Funding

European Health and Digital Executive AgencyEuropean UnionEuropean Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme 101095435the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme No 101095435 (REALM)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical AI systems and models increasingly need traceable documentation that makes intended use, performance evidence, transparency, and lifecycle status explicit, yet existing model cards, datasheets, reporting guidelines, and other documentation approaches do not consistently bring together structured clinical fields, vocabulary-linked cohort descriptions, structured performance reporting, and governed documentation history. We introduce Structured, Meaningful, Auditable, Responsible, and Transparent (SMART), a framework that adapts the model card concept into structured, lifecycle-aware documentation with OMOP integration, role-based lifecycle governance, and a blockchain-backed audit trail for verifying documentation integrity and lifecycle history. MATERIALS AND

methodsFollowing a design-science-informed approach, we analyzed documentation requirements, reviewed existing approaches, implemented SMART through open-source packages and smart contracts, and evaluated it using example SMART model cards, an illustrative COPD exacerbation risk-prediction documentation case study, and blockchain-governed lifecycle experiments.

resultsThe design process resulted in the SMART framework in which documentation provisions are reflected across Schema, Lifecycle, and Chain (ie, Blockchain) components. Evaluation showed that, in multi-party settings, documentation history remains independently verifiable because lifecycle actions are role-attributed and linked to content hashes; median testnet gas use ranged from 352 722 to 852 399 gas across the evaluated lifecycle operations. DISCUSSION: SMART positions clinical AI documentation as a shared infrastructure for preliminary model assessment, making role attribution, lifecycle state, and documentation changes more transparent and traceable over time.

conclusionBy providing an implementable framework, SMART illustrates how clinical AI documentation can be structured, clinically contextualized, auditable, responsible, transparent, and lifecycle-aware.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsBlockchainHumansartificial intelligenceblockchaindocumentationelectronic health recordsmedical records systems computerizedreproducibility of results

Identifiers

PMID42616679
PMCPMC13630299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.