ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
Cost-effectiveness of herpes zoster vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV), compared with no vaccination.
methodsTo predict health gains and costs from vaccination, we developed a decision-analytic Markov model with five health states: no herpes zoster, herpes zoster (HZ), postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), recovered from HZ and death. The model follows a hypothetical cohort of 10 000 patients with RA over a lifetime perspective and records events of HZ and PHN, along with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs from a healthcare perspective. Costs and health effects were discounted with 4% annually. Model inputs were collected from published literature and publicly available sources. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as EUR per QALY, compared with a cost-effectiveness threshold of EUR 23 650 per QALY. We performed one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
resultsVaccination led to a reduction of 2550 cases of HZ and 1303 cases of PHN per 10 000 patients with RA vaccinated, resulting in an ICER of EUR 11 205/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that the results were particularly sensitive to changes in the probability of developing PHN as a sequela of HZ. The probabilistic analysis indicated that the RZV had a 98% probability of being cost-effective at the assumed threshold value.
conclusionVaccinating patients with RA using RZV results in better health at higher cost compared with no vaccination. Under the assumptions made, vaccination is likely to be considered cost-effective for patients with RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.