Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42616497›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Safety and Mental Health Outcomes of Oregon State-Regulated Psilocybin Services.

P Todd Korthuis, Ryan R Cook, Devin Gregoire, Christopher S Stauffer, Jason B Luoma, Kellie Pertl, Don Des Jarlais, Dennis McCarty, Ximena A Levander, Kim A Hoffman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

P Todd KorthuisOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Ryan R CookOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Devin GregoireOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Christopher S StaufferOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Jason B LuomaPortland Institute for Psychedelic Science, Portland, Oregon.
Kellie PertlOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Don Des JarlaisNew York University, New York, New York.
Dennis McCartyOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Ximena A LevanderOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Kim A HoffmanOregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Adrianne R Wilson-PoeLegacy Research Institute, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Few data inform implementation of emerging state-regulated psilocybin programs. Objective: The Open Psychedelic Evaluation Nexus (OPEN) aims to assess the safety and participant outcomes of Oregon's regulated psilocybin services. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included psilocybin clients enrolled between November 2024 and March 2026, with follow-up through June 2026, at 24 of 26 Oregon psilocybin service centers with active licenses. Eligible participants were consenting Oregon psilocybin services clients supervised by 83 licensed psilocybin facilitators. OPEN's client-facing platform collects confidential data at baseline and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after psilocybin sessions supported by licensed facilitators. Exposure: Receipt of Oregon psilocybin services. Main Outcomes and Measures: Facilitator-reported psilocybin dose (in milligrams) and safety events during psilocybin session. Participant-reported depression (measured by the Participant Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale), and PTSD (6-item PTSD Checklist [PCL-6]) symptoms; mental well-being; life satisfaction; harms; overall benefit; meaning; and services satisfaction. Results: A total 346 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 49.5 [13.4] years; 181 women [52.5%]; 15 Asian [4.3%], 300 White [86.7%], 12 multiple races [3.5%]); 19 participants (5.5%) identified as veterans, 262 (76.6%) completed college, and 89 (29.0%) had a household income above $200 000. Reported substance use in the past 30 days was 203 (58.7%) for alcohol, 38 (11.0%) for nicotine or tobacco, and 127 [36.7%] for cannabis use; 44.2% were psychedelic-naive and received a mean (SD) psilocybin dose of 31.9 (11.2) mg. Retention was 93.1% at 1 week (322 participants), 92.8% at 1 month (321 participants), and 90.2% at 3 months (312 participants). Four individuals (1.2%, all psychedelic-naive) experienced adverse behavioral reactions requiring medical attention. Few participants reported their psilocybin experience as harmful (5 of 305 [1.6%] at 1 week, 6 of 321 [1.9%] at 1 month, and 7 of 312 [2.3%] at 3 months). At 1 month, 92.2% (296 of 321 participants) felt they benefited, and 58.6% (188 of 321 participants) ranked the experience among the 10 most meaningful of their life. At 3 months, participants reported decreased moderate-to-severe symptoms of depression (relative risk [RR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32-0.50), anxiety (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.22-0.38), and PTSD symptoms (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.27-0.45), and improved mental well-being (mean difference in Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale = 3.21; 95% CI, 2.66-3.76), and life satisfaction (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.19-1.44) compared with baseline. Serious adverse reactions were uncommon, although at rates that were statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multisite cohort of participants receiving state-regulated psilocybin services in Oregon, serious adverse reactions were uncommon. Most participants reported improvements in mental health, wellness, and life satisfaction. Longitudinal findings support safety and potential benefits that can inform clinicians, policymakers, and the public as other state-regulated psychedelic services emerge.

Indexed as

HallucinogensMental HealthPsilocybinSubstance-Related DisordersAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOregonHallucinogensPsilocybin

Identifiers

PMID42616497
PMCPMC13491119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.