Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42616469›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2026

Novel Analytical Workflow for Tracing Synthetic Caffeine Adulteration in Amazonian Guaraná (Paullinia cupana) Using Low-Field 1H NMR Fingerprinting and Chemometrics.

Jelmir Craveiro de Andrade, Pedro Lucas Caetano de Oliveira, Maxsueli Machado, Adriano Teixeira de Oliveira, Adriene Núzia de Almeida Santos, Carlos Adam Conte-Junior

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jelmir Craveiro de AndradeCenter for Food Analysis (NAL), Technological Development Support Laboratory (LADETEC), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro21941-598, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4886-302X
Pedro Lucas Caetano de OliveiraCenter for Food Analysis (NAL), Technological Development Support Laboratory (LADETEC), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro21941-598, RJ, Brazil.
Maxsueli MachadoCenter for Food Analysis (NAL), Technological Development Support Laboratory (LADETEC), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro21941-598, RJ, Brazil.
Adriano Teixeira de OliveiraCenter for Food Analysis (NAL), Technological Development Support Laboratory (LADETEC), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro21941-598, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4988-9878
Adriene Núzia de Almeida SantosCenter for Studies of Invertebrates and Vertebrates of the Amazon (NEIVA), Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Amazonas (IFAM), Manaus Centro Campus (CMC), Manaus69020-120, AM, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1807-162X
Carlos Adam Conte-JuniorCenter for Food Analysis (NAL), Technological Development Support Laboratory (LADETEC), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro21941-598, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-5080

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 213129/2020-1Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico 307846/2020-2Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior 88887.929271/2023-00Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior 88887.999872/2024-00Funda??o Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo ? i Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/200.738/2023Funda??o Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo ? i Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/201.534/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maués guaraná (Paullinia cupana), a Brazilian product with Geographical Indication (GI), is highly susceptible to economically motivated fraud, particularly through the undeclared addition of synthetic caffeine. Conventional chromatographic methods for authenticity control are time-consuming, costly, and rely on hazardous chemicals. This study presents a comparatively streamlined, solvent-efficient, and environmentally friendly approach based on low-field 1H NMR spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics, eliminating the need for deuterated solvents. Using authentic (n = 40), commercial (n = 18), and adulterated samples (1-10% synthetic caffeine), the data-driven soft independent modeling of the class analogy (DD-SIMCA) model achieved 100% sensitivity and over 99% accuracy for authentication. Simultaneously, a PLS regression model accurately quantified adulteration levels, showing high predictive performance (Rpred2 = 0.9891; RMSEP = 0.36%) and low detection limits. This orthogonal workflow successfully distinguished natural agro-industrial variability from intentional adulteration, demonstrating the potential of a practical, affordable, and sustainable first-line screening approach for future regulatory application.

Indexed as

CaffeineFood ContaminationPaulliniaBrazilMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyCaffeineDD-SIMCAfood authenticationgeographical indicationguaraná

Identifiers

PMID42616469
PMCPMC13495765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.