ReviewDrugs2026
Alopecia Areata: Current and Emerging Therapies.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by non-scarring hair loss and a highly heterogeneous clinical course. Historically managed with nonspecific immunosuppressive therapies, AA has undergone a major therapeutic transformation driven by advances in the understanding of its immunopathogenesis, particularly the central role of interferon-γ, interleukin-15, and other cytokines that signal through the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway as well as the development of JAK inhibitors. Targeted JAK inhibitors have emerged as the first reliably effective systemic treatments for severe AA, leading to the regulatory approval of baricitinib, ritlecitinib, and deuruxolitinib. Pivotal phase 3 trials have demonstrated clinically meaningful scalp hair regrowth with these agents, with responses often deepening over time under continuous therapy. Long-term extension studies and real-world data further support their effectiveness and manageable safety profiles in appropriately selected patients. Indirect comparative analyses suggest differences in short-term efficacy among approved JAK inhibitors, although the absence of head-to-head trials requires cautious interpretation. Beyond approved therapies, a robust pipeline bears hope that other immunomodulatory strategies can effectively address AA pathobiology. Pediatric development programs and real-world observational studies are also broadening the evidence base across age groups and clinical settings. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain. A substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve near-complete or complete regrowth, all approved medicines belong to the same drug class, and there are no agents approved for pre-adolescents. This review provides a critical overview of approved and emerging therapies for AA, integrating clinical trial data, comparative efficacy analyses, and real-world evidence, while highlighting current limitations and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.