Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42616338›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026

Subcutaneous glucose tracking during extreme perioperative perfusion stress: a prospective microdialysis study.

Petr Kopecký, Jan Bláha, Tereza Bartošová, Quynh Giang Nguyenová, Katarína Kapráľová, Natália Žišková, Tomáš Grus, Martin Haluzík

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Petr Kopecký *Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3735-0077
Jan BláhaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. jan.blaha@vfn.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7293-4337
Tereza Bartošová *Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1296-6353
Quynh Giang NguyenováDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1580-871X
Katarína KapráľováDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2475-9882
Natália ŽiškováDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3177-1025
Tomáš Grus2nd Department of Surgery - Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1355-7129
Martin HaluzíkDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0201-6888

Funding

Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky RVO-VFN 64165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine whether the subcutaneous compartment retains an interpretable glucose signal during extreme perioperative perfusion stress and whether agreement with arterial glucose differs by anatomical site. In this prospective mechanistic observational study, 20 adults undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest underwent subcutaneous microdialysis at upper thoracic and periumbilical sites. Recovery-corrected interstitial glucose was converted to calibrated subcutaneous glucose using one-point calibration. Agreement with arterial glucose was evaluated using absolute relative difference (ARD) and repeated-measures Bland-Altman analysis. Exploratory mixed-effects models examined associations of ARD with procedural phase and treatment-related variables. We analysed 743 paired measurements. Overall median ARD was 12.9% (IQR 5.9-21.9), and mean ARD was 17.2% (SD 17.2). The procedural phase was associated with ARD (global P < 0.001), with the greatest discordance during rewarming and early postoperative recovery rather than during the DHCA interval. Agreement was numerically more favourable at the upper thoracic site; however, this between-site difference did not reach statistical significance in the phase-adjusted analysis (P = 0.053). Under recovery-corrected and one-point-calibrated conditions, subcutaneous glucose retained interpretable tracking of arterial glucose during extreme perioperative perfusion stress. These findings argue against a uniform loss of subcutaneous glucose information in this setting and suggest that discordance is phase-dependent and may vary by anatomical site.

Indexed as

Circulatory arrestDeep hypothermiaMicrodialysisPerfusion stressPerioperative monitoringSubcutaneous glucose

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.