ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Subcutaneous glucose tracking during extreme perioperative perfusion stress: a prospective microdialysis study.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To determine whether the subcutaneous compartment retains an interpretable glucose signal during extreme perioperative perfusion stress and whether agreement with arterial glucose differs by anatomical site. In this prospective mechanistic observational study, 20 adults undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest underwent subcutaneous microdialysis at upper thoracic and periumbilical sites. Recovery-corrected interstitial glucose was converted to calibrated subcutaneous glucose using one-point calibration. Agreement with arterial glucose was evaluated using absolute relative difference (ARD) and repeated-measures Bland-Altman analysis. Exploratory mixed-effects models examined associations of ARD with procedural phase and treatment-related variables. We analysed 743 paired measurements. Overall median ARD was 12.9% (IQR 5.9-21.9), and mean ARD was 17.2% (SD 17.2). The procedural phase was associated with ARD (global P < 0.001), with the greatest discordance during rewarming and early postoperative recovery rather than during the DHCA interval. Agreement was numerically more favourable at the upper thoracic site; however, this between-site difference did not reach statistical significance in the phase-adjusted analysis (P = 0.053). Under recovery-corrected and one-point-calibrated conditions, subcutaneous glucose retained interpretable tracking of arterial glucose during extreme perioperative perfusion stress. These findings argue against a uniform loss of subcutaneous glucose information in this setting and suggest that discordance is phase-dependent and may vary by anatomical site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.