Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42616330›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Enhancing the Workflow of Full Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Counterclockwise Step-by-Step Approach to Resection and Reconstruction.

Luca Morelli, Annalisa Comandatore, Gregorio Di Franco, Simone Guadagni, Giovanni Caprili, Niccolò Ramacciotti, Bianca Bechini, Raffaele Gaeta, Luca Pollina, Claudia Cariello and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luca MorelliGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Annalisa ComandatoreGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gregorio Di FrancoGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Simone GuadagniGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. s.guadagni@ao-pisa.toscana.it.
Giovanni CapriliGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Niccolò RamacciottiGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Bianca BechiniGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Raffaele GaetaSecond Division of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Luca PollinaSecond Division of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Claudia CarielloMultidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Elisa GiovannettiLab of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niccolò FurbettaGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic technology has enabled the execution of complex surgical procedures through a fully minimally invasive approach. Among these procedures, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (R-PD) remains particularly challenging due to its duration and the numerous steps involved. The authors present a standardized approach designed as a reproducible framework potentially applicable to the majority of standard R-PD techniques aimed at enhancing operative workflow.

methodsThe technique is based on a stepwise model for the resection phase, performed in a counterclockwise sequence that provides a logical and reproducible pathway through the complex anatomy of the pancreatic head. The reconstruction phase follows a second counterclockwise-inspired sequence, relying on standardized anastomotic techniques designed to improve reproducibility and operative flow.

resultsBetween May 2018 and November 2025, 150 consecutive R-PDs were performed in our General Surgery Unit. The mean console time was 279.44 ± 55.85 min. All the procedures were completed using a fully robotic approach, without conversion to open surgery. The median hospital stay was 12 days (range, 9-23 days). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) occurred for 20 patients (13.3 %). Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula developed in 10 patients (6.7 %), whereas clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying was reported in 35 patients (23.3 %). The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 1.3 % (2/150 patients) and 3.3 % (5/150 patients), respectively.

conclusionsThe structured, counterclockwise-inspired surgical sequence described combined with standardized reconstruction techniques may represent an effective strategy for performing most standard R-PDs. This approach has the potential to streamline workflow and enhance surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresWorkflowAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisBarbed sutureMinimally invasive surgeryRobotic pancreatoduodenectomyRobotic surgeryWorkflow

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.