ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Assessment of open surgery suturing skills via markerless hand tracking: a multistage approach using 3D hand skeleton and kinematic metrics.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe transition toward competency-based medical education requires scalable, objective surgical skill assessment. While sensor-based approaches remain burdensome, video-based deep learning models often lack the interpretability required for formative feedback. We introduce a fully automated, markerless framework for assessing vascular open surgery suturing skills providing meaningful interpretation.
methodsOur pipeline leverages 3D hand tracking coupled to an LSTM-attention network for precise temporal segmentation. By merging explicit kinematic metrics with latent deep features, we develop a voting ensemble classifier categorizing surgeons into three skill levels. We further evaluated the impact of ground-truth reliability by comparing models trained on single-assessor versus multi-assessor consensus labels.
resultsThe framework achieved 96.4% segmentation accuracy and 72.2 ± 0.5% accuracy (F1 = 0.73) under leave-one-video-out cross-validation (LOVCV). To go deeper in assessing cross-surgeon generalization, we additionally report a strict leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) protocol, under which accuracy decreases to 52.3%. This gap quantifies the surgeon-specific component captured by video-level splits and reframes the system as a tool for longitudinal, per-trainee skill tracking rather than zero-shot scoring of unseen surgeons. Phase-stratified analysis uncovers that experts exhibit significantly higher jerk and velocity, reflecting decisive ballistic motor planning. Training on consensus labels yields a 15-20% performance increase over single-assessor baselines.
conclusionUsing a single camera and no physical markers, this framework offers a cost-effective alternative to hardware-heavy simulators, enabling democratized, interpretable feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.