SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026
Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty and the risk of postoperative infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) enhances the accuracy of component alignment, its relationship with postoperative infection risk remains uncertain. This study systematically compares infection rates following R-TKA versus manual TKA (M-TKA). A systematic search of four bibliographic databases was undertaken to retrieve comparative studies that evaluated postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing R‑TKA versus M‑TKA. Eligible studies were required to report at least one infection‑related endpoint, including those explicitly reporting zero infection events. In total, 87 studies satisfied the selection criteria, and data were combined using a random‑effects meta‑analytic framework to account for between‑study heterogeneity. R-TKA was associated with a reduced overall infection rate compared with M-TKA (P = 0.009) and a reduced risk of PJI (P = 0.007). These associations remained consistent across exploratory subgroup analyses based on clinically relevant factors (P < 0.05). Follow-up stratified analyses showed comparable periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) risk between R-TKA and M-TKA within 90 days and at 1- and 2-year follow-up. In contrast, R-TKA was linked to a reduced risk of PJI after more than 2 years of follow-up (P = 0.02). Conversely, there was no statistically significant difference in surgical site infection between the groups (P = 0.12). This study indicated that R-TKA was not linked to an increased 2-year infection risk and was associated with a reduced incidence of PJI in longer-term follow-up, suggesting comparable short-term infection outcomes and a potential association with lower long-term PJI risk compared with conventional M-TKA. The study protocol was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database (Registration No. CRD420251114140).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.