ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2026
Clinical performance of a conometric retention system for single implant restorations: 1-year analysis of a prospective multicenter study.
Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04063878 (A Prospective, Multicenter Study on Acuris™ - Conometric Concept for Single Tooth Restoration. A 5-year Follow-up Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multicenter Study on Acuris™ - Conometric Concept for Single Tooth Restoration. A 5-year Follow-up Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConventional screw- and cement-retained single implant restorations are associated with biological and technical complications. Friction-retained conometric concepts have been proposed as an alternative; however, clinical evidence for single crowns, particularly from prospective multicenter studies, remains limited. This study evaluated the 1-year clinical performance of a conometric retention system for implant-supported single crowns.
methodsThis prospective multicenter study was conducted at nine clinical centers in Europe and North America. Subjects requiring single-tooth replacement in the maxilla or mandible received one implant restored with a prefabricated 5.9° conometric abutment and a titanium nitride-coated coping. All-ceramic crowns were extraorally bonded and seated without cement or screws. Radiographs were obtained at implant placement, delivery of the permanent restoration, and after 1 year. Primary outcomes were implant and prosthetic survival. Secondary outcomes included marginal bone level (MBL) changes, bleeding on probing, plaque, probing pocket depth, and complication rates. Descriptive statistics and confidence intervals were calculated.
resultsA total of 144 implants were included in the per-protocol analysis. Three implants failed after delivery of the permanent restoration, resulting in a 1-year implant survival rate of 96.7%. Of 131 restorations evaluated at 1 year, 4 showed irreversible loss of conometric retention and were classified as prosthetic failures. In total, 22 prosthetic complication events were recorded, including 18 reversible technical complications (12.5%) and 4 irreversible failures, corresponding to an overall complication rate of 15.3%. Mean MBL change was - 0.11 mm from implant placement to PR and - 0.02 mm from PR to 1 year.
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this 1-year analysis, the investigated conometric retention system demonstrated high implant and prosthetic survival rates and limited marginal bone changes. However, a clinically relevant incidence of technical complications, including irreversible loss of conometric retention, was observed during the first year of function. These findings suggest that the conometric concept may require careful case selection and clinical monitoring. Long-term follow-up is required to further evaluate the clinical stability and prosthetic reliability of this retention concept over time.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID, NCT04063878, August 20, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.