ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2026
Biofabrication and artificial intelligence strategies for investigating solid- and fluid-pressure mechanobiology in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is shaped by a mechanically abnormal tumor microenvironment (TME) in which dysregulated mechanotransduction promotes malignant progression and therapeutic resistance. Two coupled but distinct pressure states dominate this landscape: solid stress and interstitial fluid pressure (IFP). Solid stress arises from constrained tumor growth, stromal contractility, and extracellular matrix remodeling. By contrast, IFP reflects hydrostatic pressure within the interstitial fluid compartment and is elevated by vascular leakage, impaired drainage, and low tissue hydraulic conductivity. Together, these abnormalities compress vessels, disrupt transport, and activate mechanotransduction programs that reinforce malignant adaptation. Here we integrate solid stress and IFP within a unified pressure-state framework for PDAC. We examine how these forces shape tumor progression, drug transport, and therapeutic response. We then evaluate spheroid, organoid, hydrogel, bioprinted, and microfluidic models according to what they truly control, directly measure, or merely infer. This distinction separates pressure-relevant systems from pressure-reconstructing models. We also discuss stromal normalization and the emerging role of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) in model engineering and patient stratification. Current computational approaches can optimize mechanically defined models and infer pressure-related tumor states from multimodal data. However, they still rely largely on surrogates rather than direct measurements of solid stress or IFP. Our framework defines the biomechanical validation required to develop clinically predictive models of PDAC mechanobiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616191What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.