Trial reportJournal of neurology2026
Tranexamic acid after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is associated with worse outcome in males: post hoc analysis of the ULTRA trial.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02684812 (Ultra-early Tranexamic Acid After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultra-early Tranexamic Acid After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ULTRA trial demonstrated no improvement in clinical outcome at 6 months in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) when treated with ultra-early and short-term tranexamic acid (TXA). In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated the effect of TXA in females and males on clinical outcome after aneurysmal SAH (aSAH).
methodsThe ULTRA trial was a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial, conducted between 2013 and 2020. Patients with spontaneous SAH were assigned to ultra-early, short-term TXA in addition to usual care, or usual care only. In this study, we only included ULTRA participants with radiologically proven aSAH. We analyzed the potential effect of sex on the association between treatment group and clinical outcome by assessing effect modification, and evaluated the effect of TXA separately in females and males. The primary endpoint was clinical outcome at 6 months, assessed by the distribution of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Odds ratios (OR) and adjusted OR (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using ordinal regression analyses. Secondary outcomes included good (mRS score 0-3) and excellent (mRS score 0-2) clinical outcome at 6 months, all-cause mortality at 30 days, all-cause mortality at 6 months, and in-hospital complications.
resultsOf the 812 patients, 577 (71%) were female, of whom 286 (50%) received TXA. Of the 235 males, 109 (46%) received TXA. Significant effect modification of sex on the relation between treatment group and clinical outcome was observed (p = 0.044) in all aSAH patients. No significant differences in outcomes were observed among females. In males, ordinal regression analysis showed a difference in mRS distribution at 6 months to the detriment of males treated with TXA (aOR 1.94; 95% CI 1.20-3.14). No significant differences were observed between male treatment groups in secondary outcome measures. DISCUSSION: In this post hoc analysis of the ULTRA trial, we observed a potential association between ultra-early, short-term TXA treatment and worse clinical outcomes in males at 6 months. Conversely, we did not observe a significant association between TXA treatment and clinical outcome in females. Consequently, these findings reinforce that routine use of TXA cannot be recommended in either females or males.
trial registrationThe trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02684812).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.